Which of the following patients generally does not need antibiotic treatment after incision and drainage of a simple furuncle?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the American Board of Internal Medicine Exam with our multiple choice questions and detailed explanations. Enhance your medical knowledge and skills to excel in your certification exam with confidence!

In the case of incision and drainage of a simple furuncle, antibiotic treatment is not typically required for patients who do not exhibit significant complications. A simple furuncle is generally a localized infection that can be treated effectively with drainage alone. When there are no systemic signs of infection, such as fever or lethargy, and the patient does not have any underlying conditions that could complicate the infection, additional antibiotic therapy is often unnecessary.

In contrast, patients with systemic signs of infection would warrant antibiotics due to the potential for a more widespread or severe infection. Similarly, immunosuppressed patients are at higher risk for complications and may benefit from antibiotics to prevent potential systemic spread of bacteria. Those with previous MRSA infections may also require antibiotics as a precaution against resistant organisms, particularly if there are concerns about the presence of MRSA in the current infection. Thus, the choice of not needing antibiotics primarily aligns with patients who present without significant complications associated with their furuncle.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy